| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThemeHunk TH Variation Swatches allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects TH Variation Swatches: from n/a through 1.2.7. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) on Session Token vulnerability that could potentially lead to Remote Code Execution (RCE).
|
| Leica Geosystems GR10/GR25/GR30/GR50 GNSS 4.30.063 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without request validation. Attackers can trick logged-in users into executing unauthorized actions by crafting malicious web pages that submit requests to the application. |
| iDS6 DSSPro Digital Signage System 6.2 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without request validation. Attackers can craft malicious web pages to trick logged-in administrators into adding unauthorized users by exploiting the lack of CSRF protections. |
| P5 FNIP-8x16A FNIP-4xSH 1.0.20 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without user consent. Attackers can craft malicious web pages to add new admin users, change passwords, and modify system configurations by tricking authenticated users into loading a specially crafted form. |
| Saleor is an e-commerce platform. Starting in version 3.10.0 and prior to versions 3.14.64, 3.15.39, 3.16.39, 3.17.35, 3.18.31, and 3.19.19, an attacker may bypass cross-set request forgery (CSRF) validation when calling refresh token mutation with empty string. When a user provides an empty string in `refreshToken` mutation, while the token persists in `JWT_REFRESH_TOKEN_COOKIE_NAME` cookie, application omits validation against CSRF token and returns valid access token. Versions 3.14.64, 3.15.39, 3.16.39, 3.17.35, 3.18.31, and 3.19.19 contain a patch for the issue. As a workaround, one may replace `saleor.graphql.account.mutations.authentication.refresh_token.py.get_refresh_token`. This will fix the issue, but be aware, that it returns `JWT_MISSING_TOKEN` instead of `JWT_INVALID_TOKEN`.
|
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Extend Themes EmpowerWP.This issue affects EmpowerWP: from n/a through 1.0.21. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Daniel Powney Multi Rating plugin <= 5.0.5 versions. |
| An issue was discovered in savignano S/Notify before 2.0.1 for Bitbucket. While an administrative user is logged on, the configuration settings of S/Notify can be modified via a CSRF attack. The injection could be initiated by the administrator clicking a malicious link in an email or by visiting a malicious website. If executed while an administrator is logged on to Bitbucket, an attacker could exploit this to modify the configuration of the S/Notify app on that host. This can, in particular, lead to email notifications being no longer encrypted when they should be. |
| An issue was discovered in savignano S/Notify before 4.0.2 for Confluence. While an administrative user is logged on, the configuration settings of S/Notify can be modified via a CSRF attack. The injection could be initiated by the administrator clicking a malicious link in an email or by visiting a malicious website. If executed while an administrator is logged on to Confluence, an attacker could exploit this to modify the configuration of the S/Notify app on that host. This can, in particular, lead to email notifications being no longer encrypted when they should be. |
| The Offload Videos WordPress plugin before 1.0.1 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow low privilege users to update them via a CSRF attack |
| KeePassXC-Browser thru 1.9.9.2 autofills or prompts to fill stored credentials into documents rendered under a browser-enforced CSP directive and iframe attribute sandbox, allowing attacker-controlled script in the sandboxed document to access populated form fields and exfiltrate credentials. |
| DedeCMS v5.7 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /src/dede/makehtml_list_action.php. |
| Medical Informatics Engineering Enterprise Health has a cross site request forgery vulnerability that allows an unauthenticated attacker to trick administrative users into clicking a crafted URL and perform actions on behalf of that administrative user. This issue is fixed as of 2025-04-08. |
| The پلاگین پرداخت دلخواه WordPress plugin through 2.9.8 does not have CSRF check in place when resetting its form fields, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin perform such action via a CSRF attack |
| The lacks CSRF checks allowing a user to invite any user to any group (including private groups) |
| Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Turms Admin API thru v0.10.0-SNAPSHOT allows attackers to gain escalated privileges. |
| CSRF vulnerability in narda miteq Uplink Power Contril Unit UPC2 v.1.17 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the Web-based management interface and specifically the /system_setup.htm, /set_clock.htm, /receiver_setup.htm, /cal.htm?..., and /channel_setup.htm endpoints |
| The web management interface in ETL Systems Ltd DEXTRA Series ' Digital L-Band Distribution System v1.8 does not implement Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) protection mechanisms (no tokens, no Origin/Referer validation) on critical configuration endpoints. |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in TinyFileManager all version up to and including 2.4.6 that allows attackers to upload files and run OS commands by inducing the Administrator user to browse a URL controlled by an attacker. |
