| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| A vulnerability was identified in Edimax EW-7438RPn 1.28a. Affected by this vulnerability is the function formHwSet of the file /goform/formHwSet of the component POST Request Handler. The manipulation of the argument Anntena/Mcs/regDomain/nic0Addr/nic1Addr/wlanAddr/wanAddr/wlanSSID/wlanChan/comd/initgain/txcck/txofdm leads to command injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| A vulnerability has been found in Edimax EW-7438RPn up to 1.31. Affected is the function formWizSurvey of the file /goform/formWizSurvey of the component webs. The manipulation of the argument ip/mask/gateway leads to os command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| A weakness has been identified in Edimax EW-7438RPn up to 1.31. The affected element is the function formWpsStart of the file /goform/formWpsStart of the component webs. This manipulation of the argument pinCode causes os command injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| A security vulnerability has been detected in Edimax BR-6428NS 1.10. Affected is the function formWlbasic of the file /goform/formWlbasic of the component POST Request Handler. The manipulation of the argument repeaterSSID leads to command injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| A weakness has been identified in Edimax BR-6428NS 1.10. This impacts the function system of the file /goform/formWlanM of the component POST Request Handler. Executing a manipulation of the argument ateFunc/ateGain/ateTxCount/ateChan/ateRate/ateMacID/e2pTxPower1/e2pTxPower2/e2pTxPower3/e2pTxPower4/e2pTxPower5/e2pTxPower6/e2pTxPower7/e2pTx2Power1/e2pTx2Power2/e2pTx2Power3/e2pTx2Power4/e2pTx2Power5/e2pTx2Power6/e2pTx2Power7/ateTxFreqOffset/ateMode/ateBW/ateAntenna/e2pTxFreqOffset/e2pTxPwDeltaB/e2pTxPwDeltaG/e2pTxPwDeltaMix/e2pTxPwDeltaN/readE2P can lead to command injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| Improper neutralization of special elements used in a command ('command injection') in Microsoft Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network. |
| A malicious SSH peer could send unsolicited global request responses to fill an internal buffer, blocking the connection's read loop. The blocked goroutine could not be released by calling Close(), resulting in a resource leak per connection. Unsolicited global responses are now discarded. |
| Microsoft is aware of a security feature bypass vulnerability in Windows publicly referred to as "YellowKey". The proof of concept for this vulnerability has been made public violating coordinated vulnerability best practices.
We are issuing this CVE to provide mitigation guidance that can be implemented to protect against this vulnerability until the security update is made available.
Mitigation FAQs
Should I leverage the temporary mitigation?
Microsoft recommends that you consider implementing these mitigations if you are concerned your devices and data are at risk of being compromised or stolen. For example, if your organization’s employees take their work devices home or on business travel.
What impact to service availability/management could be caused by implementing the mitigations?
Implementing these mitigations will not impact service availability or management operations.
Do customers need to revert the changes made to mitigate the vulnerability once the security update to protect against this vulnerability is available?
No. The security update will maintain the mitigation's behavior once the security update is installed.
I am using TPM+PIN, am I at risk of this vulnerability being exploited
No, if you are using TPM+PIN the vulnerability is not exploitable. |
| Improper neutralization of special elements used in a command ('command injection') in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network. |
| Improper neutralization of special elements used in a command ('command injection') in Microsoft Power Pages allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. |
| HP ENVY 5000 series printers VERBASPP1N003.2237A.00 do not properly manage concurrent TCP connections to port 9100 (JetDirect/RAW printing). An unauthenticated remote attacker on the same network can establish a persistent connection to port 9100 and send keep-alive packets, causing the printer's session threads to remain locked in a waiting state. The firmware lacks connection timeouts and concurrent session limits, resulting in a persistent Denial of Service (DoS) that renders the printer unresponsive to all user commands and print jobs. Physical intervention (manual restart) is required to restore functionality, and the attack can be immediately re-initiated. |
| Insufficient logging in the entry export feature in Devolutions Server allows an authenticated user with export permissions to export a sealed entry without triggering the unseal notification to administrators via a crafted export request.
This issue affects :
* Devolutions Server 2026.1.6.0 through 2026.1.16.0
* Devolutions Server 2025.3.20.0 and earlier |
| shell-quote's `quote()` function did not validate object-token inputs against the operator model used by `parse()`. The `.op` field was backslash-escaped character by character using `/(.)/g`, which in JavaScript does not match line terminators (\n, \r, U+2028, U+2029). A line terminator in `.op` therefore passed through unescaped into the output; POSIX shells treat a literal newline as a command separator, so any content after it would execute as a second command. The vulnerable code path is reachable in two ways: (1) direct construction of `{ op: '...\n...' }` from external input, and (2) via `parse(cmd, envFn)` when `envFn` returns object tokens whose `.op` is attacker-influenced. Both are documented API surface. Fixed by replacing the per-character escape with strict shape validation: `.op` must match the parser's control-operator allowlist; `{ op: 'glob', pattern }` validates `pattern` and forbids line terminators; `{ comment }` validates `comment` and forbids line terminators; any other object shape throws `TypeError`. |
| In Progress Telerik UI for WinUI versions prior to 2025 Q1 (3.0.0), a command injection attack is possible through improper neutralization of hyperlink elements. |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/xe/sync: Fix user fence leak on alloc failure
When dma_fence_chain_alloc() fails, properly release the user fence
reference to prevent a memory leak.
(cherry picked from commit a5d5634cde48a9fcd68c8504aa07f89f175074a0) |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu: add upper bound check on user inputs in wait ioctl
Huge input values in amdgpu_userq_wait_ioctl can lead to a OOM and
could be exploited.
So check these input value against AMDGPU_USERQ_MAX_HANDLES
which is big enough value for genuine use cases and could
potentially avoid OOM.
v2: squash in Srini's fix
(cherry picked from commit fcec012c664247531aed3e662f4280ff804d1476) |
| Allocation of resources without limits or throttling vulnerability in Progress Software MOVEit Automation allows Excessive Allocation.
This issue affects MOVEit Automation: before 2025.0.11, from 2025.1.0 before 2025.1.7. |
| A potential security vulnerability has been identified in the HP Linux Imaging and Printing Software. This potential vulnerability may allow escalation of privileges and/or arbitrary code execution via operating system command injection. |
| Allocation of resources without limits or throttling vulnerability in Progress Software MOVEit Automation allows Flooding.
This issue affects MOVEit Automation: before 2025.0.11, from 2025.1.0 before 2025.1.7. |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdkfd: Unreserve bo if queue update failed
Error handling path should unreserve bo then return failed.
(cherry picked from commit c24afed7de9ecce341825d8ab55a43a254348b33) |
