| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| An issue was discovered in 6.0 before 6.0.4, 5.2 before 5.2.13, and 4.2 before 4.2.30.
`ASGIRequest` allows a remote attacker to spoof headers by exploiting an ambiguous mapping of two header variants (with hyphens or with underscores) to a single version with underscores.
Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected.
Django would like to thank Tarek Nakkouch for reporting this issue. |
| An issue was discovered in 6.0 before 6.0.4, 5.2 before 5.2.13, and 4.2 before 4.2.30.
Add permissions on inline model instances were not validated on submission of
forged `POST` data in `GenericInlineModelAdmin`.
Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected.
Django would like to thank N05ec@LZU-DSLab for reporting this issue. |
| An issue was discovered in 6.0 before 6.0.4, 5.2 before 5.2.13, and 4.2 before 4.2.30.
Admin changelist forms using `ModelAdmin.list_editable` incorrectly allowed new
instances to be created via forged `POST` data.
Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected.
Django would like to thank Cantina for reporting this issue. |
| An issue was discovered in 6.0 before 6.0.4, 5.2 before 5.2.13, and 4.2 before 4.2.30.
`MultiPartParser` allows remote attackers to degrade performance by submitting multipart uploads with `Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64` including excessive whitespace.
Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected.
Django would like to thank Seokchan Yoon for reporting this issue. |
| An issue was discovered in 6.0 before 6.0.4, 5.2 before 5.2.13, and 4.2 before 4.2.30.
ASGI requests with a missing or understated `Content-Length` header could
bypass the `DATA_UPLOAD_MAX_MEMORY_SIZE` limit when reading
`HttpRequest.body`, allowing remote attackers to load an unbounded request body into
memory.
Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected.
Django would like to thank Superior for reporting this issue. |
| Frappe is a full-stack web application framework. Prior to 16.14.0 and 15.104.0, Frappe has a SQL injection in bulk_update. This vulnerability is fixed in 16.14.0 and 15.104.0. |
| There is a memory corruption vulnerability due to an out-of-bounds write when loading a corrupted LVLIB file in NI LabVIEW. This vulnerability may result in information disclosure or arbitrary code execution. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to get a user to open a specially crafted .lvlib file. This vulnerability affects NI LabVIEW 2026 Q1 (26.1.0) and prior versions. |
| There is a memory corruption vulnerability due to an out-of-bounds write when loading a corrupted LVCLASS file in NI LabVIEW. This vulnerability may result in information disclosure or arbitrary code execution. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to get a user to open a specially crafted .lvclass file. This vulnerability affects NI LabVIEW 2026 Q1 (26.1.0) and prior versions. |
| There is a memory corruption vulnerability due to an out-of-bounds write in ResFileFactory::InitResourceMgr() in NI LabVIEW. This vulnerability may result in information disclosure or arbitrary code execution. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to get a user to open a specially crafted VI file. This vulnerability affects NI LabVIEW 2026 Q1 (26.1.0) and prior versions. |
| There is a memory corruption vulnerability due to an out-of-bounds read in sentry_transaction_context_set_operation() in NI LabVIEW. This vulnerability may result in information disclosure or arbitrary code execution. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to get a user to open a specially crafted VI file. This vulnerability affects NI LabVIEW 2026 Q1 (26.1.0) and prior versions. |
| There is a memory corruption vulnerability due to an out-of-bounds read in mgcore_SH_25_3!aligned_free() in NI LabVIEW. This vulnerability may result in information disclosure or arbitrary code execution. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to get a user to open a specially crafted VI file. This vulnerability affects NI LabVIEW 2026 Q1 (26.1.0) and prior versions. |
| Podman Desktop is a graphical tool for developing on containers and Kubernetes. Prior to 1.26.2, an unauthenticated HTTP server exposed by Podman Desktop allows any network attacker to remotely trigger denial-of-service conditions and extract sensitive information. By abusing missing connection limits and timeouts, an attacker can exhaust file descriptors and kernel memory, leading to application crash or full host freeze. Additionally, verbose error responses disclose internal paths and system details (including usernames on Windows), aiding further exploitation. The issue requires no authentication or user interaction and is exploitable over the network. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.26.2. |
| D-Link DI-8300 v16.07.26A1 was discovered to contain a buffer overflow via the fn parameter in the tgfile_htm function. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted input. |
| Tenda AC6 15.03.05.16_multi is vulnerable to Buffer Overflow in the formSetCfm function via the funcname, funcpara1, and funcpara2 parameters. |
| D-Link DI-8003 v16.07.26A1, DI-8500 v16.07.26A1; DI-8003G v17.12.21A1, DI-8200G v17.12.20A1, DI-8200 v16.07.26A1, DI-8400 v16.07.26A1, DI-8004w v16.07.26A1, DI-8100 v16.07.26A1, and DI-8100G v17.12.20A1 were discovered to contain a buffer overflow via the rd_en, rd_auth, rd_acct, http_hadmin, http_hadminpwd, rd_key, and rd_ip parameters in the radius_asp function. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted request. |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in D-Link DI-8003 16.07.26A1 due to improper handling of multiple parameters in the /web_post.asp endpoint. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP GET request in parameters such as name, en, user_id, log, and time. |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in D-Link DI-8003 16.07.26A1 due to improper handling of parameters in the /xwgl_ref.asp endpoint. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP GET request with excessively long strings in parameters name, en, user_id, shibie_name, time, act, log, and rpri. |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in D-Link DI-8003 16.07.26A1 due to improper handling of the http_lanport parameter in the /webgl.asp endpoint. |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in D-Link DI-8003 16.07.26A1 due to improper validation of user input in the qj.asp endpoint. |
| A vulnerability has been discovered in D-Link DI-8003 16.07.26A1, which can lead to a buffer overflow when the s parameter in the pppoe_list_opt.asp endpoint is manipulated. By sending a crafted request with an excessively large value for the s parameter, an attacker can trigger a buffer overflow condition. |
