| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| It's possible to brute force folders and files, what can be used by an attacker to steal sensitve information. |
| A remote, unauthorized attacker can brute force folders and files and read them like private keys or configurations, making the application vulnerable for gathering sensitive information. |
| A user with the appropriate authorization can create any number of user accounts via an API endpoint using a POST request. There are no quotas, checking mechanisms or restrictions to limit the creation. |
| Due to a lack of authentication, it is possible for an unauthenticated user to request data from this endpoint, making the application vulnerable for user enumeration. |
| An API endpoint allows arbitrary log entries to be created via POST request. Without sufficient validation of the input data, an attacker can create manipulated log entries and thus falsify or dilute logs, for example. |
| When an error occurs in the application a full stacktrace is provided to the user. The stacktrace lists class and method names as well as other internal information. An attacker can thus obtain information about the technology used and the structure of the application. |
| If a user tries to login but the provided credentials are incorrect a log is created. The data for this POST requests is not validated and it’s possible to send giant payloads which are then logged. |
| The application provides access to a login protected H2 database for caching purposes. The username is prefilled. |
| In the HTTP request, the username and password are transferred directly in the URL as parameters. However, URLs can be stored in various systems such as server logs, browser histories or proxy servers. As a result, there is a high risk that this sensitive data will be disclosed unintentionally. |
| The application fails to implement several security headers. These headers help increase the overall security level of the web application by e.g., preventing the application to be displayed in an iFrame (Clickjacking attacks) or not executing injected malicious JavaScript code (XSS attacks). |
| The server supports authentication methods in which credentials are sent in plaintext over unencrypted channels. If an attacker were to intercept traffic between a client and this server, the credentials would be exposed. |
| The FTP server’s login mechanism does not restrict authentication attempts, allowing an attacker to brute-force user passwords and potentially compromising the FTP server. |
| A service supports the use of a deprecated and unsafe TLS version. This could be exploited to expose sensitive information, modify data in unexpected ways or spoof identities of other users or devices, affecting the confidentiality and integrity of the device. |
| The application uses a weak password hash function, allowing an attacker to crack the weak password hash to gain access to an FTP user account. |
| The Media Server’s authorization tokens have a poor quality of randomness. An attacker may be able to guess the token of an active user by computing plausible tokens. |
| The backup ZIPs are not signed by the application, leading to the possibility that an attacker can download a backup ZIP, modify and re-upload it. This allows the attacker to disrupt the application by configuring the services in a way that they are unable to run, making the application unusable. They can redirect traffic that is meant to be internal to their own hosted services and gathering information. |
| The created backup files are unencrypted, making the application vulnerable for gathering sensitive information by downloading and decompressing the backup files. |
| Uploading unvalidated container images may allow remote attackers to gain full access to the system, potentially compromising its integrity and confidentiality. |
| This CVE ID was assigned in error.
The End-of-Life status of a component, by itself, does not constitute a vulnerability under the CVE Program’s rules.
This condition represents a security weakness (CWE-1104: Use of Unmaintained Third-Party Components) rather than a specific vulnerability instance. |
| The system is deployed in its default state, with configuration settings that do not comply with the latest best practices for restricting access. This increases the risk of unauthorised connections. |
