Export limit exceeded: 345804 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (34886 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-26031 | 1 Joomla | 1 Joomla\! | 2026-02-25 | 5.3 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Joomla! 3.0.0 through 3.9.25. Inadequate filters on module layout settings could lead to an LFI. | ||||
| CVE-2021-23127 | 1 Joomla | 1 Joomla\! | 2026-02-25 | 9.1 Critical |
| An issue was discovered in Joomla! 3.2.0 through 3.9.24. Usage of an insufficient length for the 2FA secret accoring to RFC 4226 of 10 bytes vs 20 bytes. | ||||
| CVE-2021-23128 | 1 Joomla | 1 Joomla\! | 2026-02-25 | 9.1 Critical |
| An issue was discovered in Joomla! 3.2.0 through 3.9.24. The core shipped but unused randval implementation within FOF (FOFEncryptRandval) used an potential insecure implemetation. That has now been replaced with a call to 'random_bytes()' and its backport that is shipped within random_compat. | ||||
| CVE-2022-23799 | 1 Joomla | 1 Joomla\! | 2026-02-25 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue was discovered in Joomla! 4.0.0 through 4.1.0. Under specific circumstances, JInput pollutes method-specific input bags with $_REQUEST data. | ||||
| CVE-2022-27911 | 1 Joomla | 1 Joomla\! | 2026-02-25 | 5.3 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Joomla! 4.2.0. Multiple Full Path Disclosures because of missing '_JEXEC or die check' caused by the PSR12 changes. | ||||
| CVE-2019-25326 | 2 Northwest Performance Software, Nwpsw | 2 Ippulse, Ippulse | 2026-02-24 | 6.2 Medium |
| ipPulse 1.92 contains a denial of service vulnerability that allows local attackers to crash the application by providing an oversized input in the Enter Key field. Attackers can generate a 256-byte buffer of repeated 'A' characters to trigger an application crash when pasting the malicious content. | ||||
| CVE-2022-22531 | 1 Sap | 1 S\/4hana | 2026-02-24 | 8.1 High |
| The F0743 Create Single Payment application of SAP S/4HANA - versions 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, does not check uploaded or downloaded files. This allows an attacker with basic user rights to run arbitrary script code, resulting in sensitive information being disclosed or modified. | ||||
| CVE-2022-22530 | 1 Sap | 1 S\/4hana | 2026-02-24 | 8.1 High |
| The F0743 Create Single Payment application of SAP S/4HANA - versions 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, does not check uploaded or downloaded files. This allows an attacker with basic user rights to inject dangerous content or malicious code which could result in critical information being modified or completely compromise the availability of the application. | ||||
| CVE-2025-15313 | 1 Tanium | 3 Endpoint Euss, Euss, Tanium Euss | 2026-02-24 | 5.5 Medium |
| Tanium addressed an arbitrary file deletion vulnerability in Tanium EUSS. | ||||
| CVE-2025-15310 | 1 Tanium | 3 Endpoint Configuration Toolset Solution, Endpoint Patch, Patch Endpoint Tools | 2026-02-24 | 7.8 High |
| Tanium addressed a local privilege escalation vulnerability in Patch Endpoint Tools. | ||||
| CVE-2024-38268 | 1 Zyxel | 82 Ax7501-b1, Ax7501-b1 Firmware, Dx3300-t0 and 79 more | 2026-02-24 | 4.9 Medium |
| An improper restriction of operations within the bounds of a memory buffer in the MAC address parser of the Zyxel VMG8825-T50K firmware versions through 5.50(ABOM.8)C0 could allow an authenticated attacker with administrator privileges to cause potential memory corruptions, resulting in a thread crash on an affected device. | ||||
| CVE-2024-38267 | 1 Zyxel | 82 Ax7501-b1, Ax7501-b1 Firmware, Dx3300-t0 and 79 more | 2026-02-24 | 4.9 Medium |
| An improper restriction of operations within the bounds of a memory buffer in the IPv6 address parser of the Zyxel VMG8825-T50K firmware versions through 5.50(ABOM.8)C0 could allow an authenticated attacker with administrator privileges to cause potential memory corruptions, resulting in a thread crash on an affected device. | ||||
| CVE-2024-38269 | 1 Zyxel | 82 Ax7501-b1, Ax7501-b1 Firmware, Dx3300-t0 and 79 more | 2026-02-24 | 4.9 Medium |
| An improper restriction of operations within the bounds of a memory buffer in the USB file-sharing handler of the Zyxel VMG8825-T50K firmware versions through 5.50(ABOM.8)C0 could allow an authenticated attacker with administrator privileges to cause potential memory corruptions, resulting in a thread crash on an affected device. | ||||
| CVE-2021-40032 | 1 Huawei | 1 Harmonyos | 2026-02-24 | 7.5 High |
| The bone voice ID TA has a vulnerability in information management,Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect data confidentiality. | ||||
| CVE-2021-39298 | 1 Hp | 374 260 G3 Desktop Mini Pc, 260 G3 Desktop Mini Pc Firmware, Elite Dragonfly and 371 more | 2026-02-24 | 8.8 High |
| A potential vulnerability in AMD System Management Mode (SMM) interrupt handler may allow an attacker with high privileges to access the SMM resulting in arbitrary code execution which could be used by malicious actors to bypass security mechanisms provided in the UEFI firmware. | ||||
| CVE-2021-36958 | 1 Microsoft | 18 Windows, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 15 more | 2026-02-24 | 7.8 High |
| <p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged file operations. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code with SYSTEM privileges. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights.</p> | ||||
| CVE-2021-24105 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Package Manager Configurations | 2026-02-24 | 8.4 High |
| <p>Depending on configuration of various package managers it is possible for an attacker to insert a malicious package into a package manager's repository which can be retrieved and used during development, build, and release processes. This insertion could lead to remote code execution. We believe this vulnerability affects multiple package managers across multiple languages, including but not limited to: Python/pip, .NET/NuGet, Java/Maven, JavaScript/npm.</p> <p><strong>Attack scenarios</strong></p> <p>An attacker could take advantage of this ecosystem-wide issue to cause harm in a variety of ways. The original attack scenarios were discovered by Alex Birsan and are detailed in their whitepaper, <a href="https://medium.com/@alex.birsan/dependency-confusion-4a5d60fec610">Dependency Confusion: How I Hacked Into Apple, Microsoft and Dozens of Other Companies</a>.</p> <ul> <li><p>With basic knowledge of the target ecosystems, an attacker could create an empty shell for a package and insert malicious code in the install scripts, give it a high version, and publish it to the public repository. Vulnerable victim machines will download the higher version of the package between the public and private repositories and attempt to install it. Due to code incompatibility it will probably error out upon import or upon compilation, making it easier to detect; however the attacker would have gained code execution by that point.</p> </li> <li><p>An advanced attacker with some inside knowledge of the target could take a copy of a working package, insert the malicious code (in the package itself or in the install), and then publish it to a public repository. The package will likely install and import correctly, granting the attacker an initial foothold and persistence.</p> </li> </ul> <p>These two methods could affect target organizations at any of these various levels:</p> <ul> <li>Developer machines</li> <li>An entire team if the configuration to import the malicious package is uploaded to a code repository</li> <li>Continuous integration pipelines if they pull the malicious packages during the build, test, and/or deploy stages</li> <li>Customers, download servers, production services if the malicious code has not been detected</li> </ul> <p>This remote code execution vulnerability can only be addressed by reconfiguring installation tools and workflows, and not by correcting anything in the package repositories themselves. See the <strong>FAQ</strong> section of this CVE for configuration guidance.</p> | ||||
| CVE-2021-1730 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Exchange Server | 2026-02-24 | 5.4 Medium |
| <p>A spoofing vulnerability exists in Microsoft Exchange Server which could result in an attack that would allow a malicious actor to impersonate the user.</p> <p>This update addresses this vulnerability.</p> <p>To prevent these types of attacks, Microsoft recommends customers to download inline images from different DNSdomains than the rest of OWA. Please see further instructions in the FAQ to put in place this mitigations.</p> | ||||
| CVE-2025-15141 | 1 Halo | 1 Halo | 2026-02-24 | 3.1 Low |
| A vulnerability was determined in Halo up to 2.21.10. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /actuator of the component Configuration Handler. Executing a manipulation can lead to information disclosure. The attack may be performed from remote. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitability is assessed as difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12616 | 1 Phpgurukul | 1 News Portal | 2026-02-24 | 3.7 Low |
| A vulnerability was detected in PHPGurukul News Portal 1.0. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /onps/settings.py. Performing a manipulation results in insertion of sensitive information into debugging code. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is regarded as difficult. The exploit is now public and may be used. | ||||