Export limit exceeded: 18621 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 17481 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 42846 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (42846 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-31061 | 1 Utt | 3 810g, 810g Firmware, Hiper 810g | 2026-04-10 | 4.5 Medium |
| UTT Aggressive HiPER 810G v3v1.7.7-171114 was discovered to contain a buffer overflow in the timestart parameter of the ConfigAdvideo function. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted input. | ||||
| CVE-2026-31063 | 1 Utt | 3 1200gw, 1200gw Firmware, Hiper 1200gw | 2026-04-10 | 4.5 Medium |
| UTT Aggressive HiPER 1200GW v2.5.3-170306 was discovered to contain a buffer overflow in the pools parameter of the formArpBindConfig function. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted input. | ||||
| CVE-2025-50671 | 1 Dlink | 1 Di-8003 | 2026-04-10 | 7.5 High |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in D-Link DI-8003 16.07.26A1 due to improper handling of parameters in the /xwgl_ref.asp endpoint. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP GET request with excessively long strings in parameters name, en, user_id, shibie_name, time, act, log, and rpri. | ||||
| CVE-2025-50664 | 1 Dlink | 1 Di-8003 | 2026-04-10 | 7.5 High |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in D-Link DI-8003 16.07.26A1 due to improper handling of parameters in the /user_group.asp endpoint. The attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP GET request with parameters name, mem, pri, and attr. | ||||
| CVE-2025-50663 | 1 Dlink | 1 Di-8003 | 2026-04-10 | 7.5 High |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in D-Link DI-8003 16.07.26A1 due to improper handling of the name parameter in the /usb_paswd.asp endpoint. | ||||
| CVE-2025-50662 | 1 D-link | 1 Di-8003 | 2026-04-10 | 7.5 High |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in D-Link DI-8003 16.07.26A1 due to improper handling of the name parameter in the /url_group.asp endpoint. | ||||
| CVE-2025-50661 | 1 D-link | 1 Di-8003 | 2026-04-10 | 7.5 High |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in D-Link DI-8003 16.07.26A1 due to improper handling of multiple parameters in the /url_rule.asp endpoint. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP GET request with parameters name, en, ips, u, time, act, rpri, and log. | ||||
| CVE-2025-50660 | 1 D-link | 1 Di-8003 | 2026-04-10 | 7.5 High |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in D-Link DI-8003 16.07.26A1 due to improper handling of the name parameter in the /url_member.asp endpoint. | ||||
| CVE-2025-50659 | 1 D-link | 1 Di-8003 | 2026-04-10 | 7.5 High |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in D-Link DI-8003 16.07.26A1 due to improper handling of the custom_error parameter in the /user.asp endpoint. | ||||
| CVE-2025-50657 | 1 Dlink | 1 Di-8003 | 2026-04-10 | 7.5 High |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in D-Link DI-8003 16.07.26A1 due to improper handling of the pid parameter in the /trace.asp endpoint. | ||||
| CVE-2025-50655 | 1 Dlink | 1 Di-8003 | 2026-04-10 | 7.5 High |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in D-Link DI-8003 16.07.26A1 due to improper handling of the name parameter in the /thd_group.asp endpoint. | ||||
| CVE-2025-59969 | 1 Juniper Networks | 1 Junos Os Evolved | 2026-04-10 | 6.5 Medium |
| A Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') vulnerability in the advanced forwarding toolkit (evo-aftmand/evo-pfemand) of Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved on PTX Series or QFX5000 Series allows an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS).An attacker sending crafted multicast packets will cause line cards running evo-aftmand/evo-pfemand to crash and restart or non-line card devices to crash and restart. Continued receipt and processing of these packets will sustain the Denial of Service (DoS) condition. This issue affects Junos OS Evolved PTX Series: * All versions before 22.4R3-S8-EVO, * from 23.2 before 23.2R2-S5-EVO, * from 23.4 before 23.4R2-EVO, * from 24.2 before 24.2R2-EVO, * from 24.4 before 24.4R2-EVO. This issue affects Junos OS Evolved on QFX5000 Series: * 22.2-EVO version before 22.2R3-S7-EVO, * 22.4-EVO version before 22.4R3-S7-EVO, * 23.2-EVO versions before 23.2R2-S4-EVO, * 23.4-EVO versions before 23.4R2-S5-EVO, * 24.2-EVO versions before 24.2R2-S1-EVO, * 24.4-EVO versions before 24.4R1-S3-EVO, 24.4R2-EVO. This issue does not affect Junos OS Evolved on QFX5000 Series versions before: 21.2R2-S1-EVO, 21.2R3-EVO, 21.3R2-EVO, 21.4R1-EVO, and 22.1R1-EVO. | ||||
| CVE-2026-5979 | 1 D-link | 1 Dir-605l | 2026-04-10 | 8.8 High |
| A vulnerability was detected in D-Link DIR-605L 2.13B01. Affected by this vulnerability is the function formVirtualServ of the file /goform/formVirtualServ of the component POST Request Handler. The manipulation of the argument curTime results in buffer overflow. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer. | ||||
| CVE-2026-5447 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2026-04-10 | 5.3 Medium |
| Heap buffer overflow in CertFromX509 via AuthorityKeyIdentifier size confusion. A heap buffer overflow occurs when converting an X.509 certificate internally due to incorrect size handling of the AuthorityKeyIdentifier extension. | ||||
| CVE-2026-31066 | 1 Utt | 3 810g, 810g Firmware, Hiper 810g | 2026-04-10 | 4.5 Medium |
| UTT Aggressive HiPER 810G v3v1.7.7-171114 was discovered to contain a buffer overflow in the selDateType parameter of the formTaskEdit function. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted input. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28205 | 1 Openplcproject | 1 Openplc V3 | 2026-04-10 | N/A |
| OpenPLC_V3 is vulnerable to an Initialization of a Resource with an Insecure Default vulnerability which could allow an attacker to gain access to the system by bypassing authentication via an API. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34478 | 1 Apache | 1 Log4j | 2026-04-10 | N/A |
| Apache Log4j Core's Rfc5424Layout https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/layouts.html#RFC5424Layout , in versions 2.21.0 through 2.25.3, is vulnerable to log injection via CRLF sequences due to undocumented renames of security-relevant configuration attributes. Two distinct issues affect users of stream-based syslog services who configure Rfc5424Layout directly: * The newLineEscape attribute was silently renamed, causing newline escaping to stop working for users of TCP framing (RFC 6587), exposing them to CRLF injection in log output. * The useTlsMessageFormat attribute was silently renamed, causing users of TLS framing (RFC 5425) to be silently downgraded to unframed TCP (RFC 6587), without newline escaping. Users of the SyslogAppender are not affected, as its configuration attributes were not modified. Users are advised to upgrade to Apache Log4j Core 2.25.4, which corrects this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34479 | 1 Apache | 1 Log4j 1 2 Api | 2026-04-10 | N/A |
| The Log4j1XmlLayout from the Apache Log4j 1-to-Log4j 2 bridge fails to escape characters forbidden by the XML 1.0 standard, producing malformed XML output. Conforming XML parsers are required to reject documents containing such characters with a fatal error, which may cause downstream log processing systems to drop or fail to index affected records. Two groups of users are affected: * Those using Log4j1XmlLayout directly in a Log4j Core 2 configuration file. * Those using the Log4j 1 configuration compatibility layer with org.apache.log4j.xml.XMLLayout specified as the layout class. Users are advised to upgrade to Apache Log4j 1-to-Log4j 2 bridge version 2.25.4, which corrects this issue. Note: The Apache Log4j 1-to-Log4j 2 bridge is deprecated and will not be present in Log4j 3. Users are encouraged to consult the Log4j 1 to Log4j 2 migration guide https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/migrate-from-log4j1.html , and specifically the section on eliminating reliance on the bridge. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34480 | 1 Apache | 1 Log4j | 2026-04-10 | N/A |
| Apache Log4j Core's XmlLayout https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/layouts.html#XmlLayout , in versions up to and including 2.25.3, fails to sanitize characters forbidden by the XML 1.0 specification https://www.w3.org/TR/xml/#charsets producing invalid XML output whenever a log message or MDC value contains such characters. The impact depends on the StAX implementation in use: * JRE built-in StAX: Forbidden characters are silently written to the output, producing malformed XML. Conforming parsers must reject such documents with a fatal error, which may cause downstream log-processing systems to drop the affected records. * Alternative StAX implementations (e.g., Woodstox https://github.com/FasterXML/woodstox , a transitive dependency of the Jackson XML Dataformat module): An exception is thrown during the logging call, and the log event is never delivered to its intended appender, only to Log4j's internal status logger. Users are advised to upgrade to Apache Log4j Core 2.25.4, which corrects this issue by sanitizing forbidden characters before XML output. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34481 | 1 Apache | 1 Log4j Layout Template Json | 2026-04-10 | N/A |
| Apache Log4j's JsonTemplateLayout https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/json-template-layout.html , in versions up to and including 2.25.3, produces invalid JSON output when log events contain non-finite floating-point values (NaN, Infinity, or -Infinity), which are prohibited by RFC 8259. This may cause downstream log processing systems to reject or fail to index affected records. An attacker can exploit this issue only if both of the following conditions are met: * The application uses JsonTemplateLayout. * The application logs a MapMessage containing an attacker-controlled floating-point value. Users are advised to upgrade to Apache Log4j JSON Template Layout 2.25.4, which corrects this issue. | ||||