Export limit exceeded: 357129 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 357129 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (357129 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-71330 | 2026-06-10 | 7.5 High | ||
| image-size through 2.0.2 contains a denial of service vulnerability that allows remote attackers to permanently block the Node.js event loop by supplying a specially crafted ICNS image buffer. Attackers can craft an ICNS buffer containing valid magic bytes and a zero-valued entry length field to trigger an infinite loop in the ICNS parser, as the offset is never incremented when the entry length field is 0, causing the while loop condition to remain true indefinitely. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34707 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 3 Incopy, Macos, Windows | 2026-06-10 | 7.8 High |
| InCopy versions 21.3, 20.5.3 and earlier are affected by a Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-40991 | 1 Spring | 1 Spring Rest Docs | 2026-06-10 | 5.9 Medium |
| When using spring-restdocs-webtestclient or spring-restdocs-restassured to document a remote API accessed over HTTP, an attacker who compromises the API or tricks the user into documenting a malicious API can perform an XXE injection attack when the documentation-generating tests are next executed. Affected versions: Spring REST Docs 4.0.0; 3.0.0 through 3.0.5; 2.0.0.RELEASE through 2.0.8.RELEASE. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34706 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 3 Incopy, Macos, Windows | 2026-06-10 | 7.8 High |
| InCopy versions 21.3, 20.5.3 and earlier are affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34705 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 4 Indesign, Indesign Desktop, Macos and 1 more | 2026-06-10 | 5.5 Medium |
| InDesign Desktop versions 21.3, 20.5.3 and earlier are affected by an out-of-bounds read vulnerability that could lead to disclosure of sensitive memory. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to disclose sensitive information. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34704 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 4 Indesign, Indesign Desktop, Macos and 1 more | 2026-06-10 | 5.5 Medium |
| InDesign Desktop versions 21.3, 20.5.3 and earlier are affected by a NULL Pointer Dereference vulnerability that could result in an application denial-of-service. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to crash the application, leading to a denial-of-service condition. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34703 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 4 Indesign, Indesign Desktop, Macos and 1 more | 2026-06-10 | 5.5 Medium |
| InDesign Desktop versions 21.3, 20.5.3 and earlier are affected by a NULL Pointer Dereference vulnerability that could result in an application denial-of-service. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to crash the application, leading to a denial-of-service condition. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34702 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 4 Indesign, Indesign Desktop, Macos and 1 more | 2026-06-10 | 7.8 High |
| InDesign Desktop versions 21.3, 20.5.3 and earlier are affected by a Stack-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34701 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 4 Indesign, Indesign Desktop, Macos and 1 more | 2026-06-10 | 7.8 High |
| InDesign Desktop versions 21.3, 20.5.3 and earlier are affected by a Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34700 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 4 Indesign, Indesign Desktop, Macos and 1 more | 2026-06-10 | 7.8 High |
| InDesign Desktop versions 21.3, 20.5.3 and earlier are affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34699 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 4 Indesign, Indesign Desktop, Macos and 1 more | 2026-06-10 | 7.8 High |
| InDesign Desktop versions 21.3, 20.5.3 and earlier are affected by a Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34698 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 4 Indesign, Indesign Desktop, Macos and 1 more | 2026-06-10 | 7.8 High |
| InDesign Desktop versions 21.3, 20.5.3 and earlier are affected by a Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-40993 | 1 Spring | 1 Spring Security | 2026-06-10 | 7.3 High |
| An attacker with write permissions to the database table managed by JdbcAssertingPartyMetadataRepository (saml2_asserting_party_metadata) may be able to store malicious serialized payloads in the columns containing the collection of verification or encryption credentials (verification_credentials and encryption_credentials, respectively). Affected versions: Spring Security 7.0.0 through 7.0.5. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34697 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 4 Indesign, Indesign Desktop, Macos and 1 more | 2026-06-10 | 7.8 High |
| InDesign Desktop versions 21.3, 20.5.3 and earlier are affected by a Stack-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34696 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 4 Indesign, Indesign Desktop, Macos and 1 more | 2026-06-10 | 7.8 High |
| InDesign Desktop versions 21.3, 20.5.3 and earlier are affected by a Use After Free vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34695 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 4 Indesign, Indesign Desktop, Macos and 1 more | 2026-06-10 | 7.8 High |
| InDesign Desktop versions 21.3, 20.5.3 and earlier are affected by a Stack-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-45328 | 1 Espressif | 1 Esp-idf | 2026-06-10 | 9.3 Critical |
| ESF-IDF is the Espressif Internet of Things (IOT) Development Framework. In versions 5.5.4 and 6.0, the esp_tee component exposes secure-service wrappers in esp_secure_services.c and esp_secure_services_iram.c that bridge calls from the user application (i.e. the REE) to TEE-protected hardware peripherals (AES, SHA, ECC, HMAC, SPI, MMU, WDT) and to the security feature like attestation, OTA updates, secure storage. This issue has been patched in versions 5.5.5 and 6.0.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-46540 | 1 Nimiq | 1 Core-rs-albatross | 2026-06-10 | 6.5 Medium |
| Nimiq is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.4.0, when LightBlockchain::rebranch() adopts a fork chain whose tip is a macro block (checkpoint or election), it only updates self.head but fails to update self.macro_head, self.election_head, self.current_validators, or store the election header in the chain_store. This is in direct contrast with the full Blockchain::rebranch() at blockchain/src/blockchain/push.rs:504-518, which correctly updates all macro/election state when the new head is a macro block. After a rebranch to a macro block, the stale macro_head causes subsequent macro blocks pushed via push() to be verified against the wrong predecessor via verify_macro_successor(&this.macro_head). If the rebranch target was an election block, the stale current_validators causes every subsequent block to fail verify_validators(), completely stalling the light client's chain progression. This issue has been patched in version 1.4.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34708 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 3 Incopy, Macos, Windows | 2026-06-10 | 7.8 High |
| InCopy versions 21.3, 20.5.3 and earlier are affected by a Stack-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20245 | 1 Cisco | 2 Catalyst Sd-wan Manager, Sd-wan Vsmart Controller | 2026-06-10 | 7.8 High |
| A vulnerability in the CLI of Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller, formerly SD-WAN vSmart, Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager, formerly SD-WAN vManage, and Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Validator, formerly SD-WAN vBond, could allow an authenticated, local attacker to execute arbitrary commands as root by supplying a crafted file to the affected system. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by uploading a crafted file to the affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform command injection attacks on an affected system and elevate their privileges as the root user. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have netadmin privileges on the affected system. This would require valid credentials or exploitation of or . Cisco is not aware of successful exploitation by other methods. Cisco has observed limited cases where the exploitation of this bug resulted in a configuration change pushed to edge devices. Cisco recommends that customers upgrade to the fixed software that is documented in the that was published on May 14, 2026, and verify the configuration of the edge devices. | ||||