Export limit exceeded: 10179 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (10179 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-41186 | 1 Sap | 1 3d Visual Enterprise Viewer | 2026-02-25 | 7.8 High |
| Due to lack of proper memory management, when a victim opens manipulated Computer Graphics Metafile (.cgm, CgmCore.dll) file received from untrusted sources in SAP 3D Visual Enterprise Viewer - version 9, a Remote Code Execution can be triggered when payload forces a stack-based overflow and or a re-use of dangling pointer which refers to overwritten space in memory. | ||||
| CVE-2022-41185 | 1 Sap | 1 3d Visual Enterprise Author | 2026-02-25 | 7.8 High |
| Due to lack of proper memory management, when a victim opens a manipulated Visual Design Stream (.vds, MataiPersistence.dll) file received from untrusted sources in SAP 3D Visual Enterprise Author - version 9, it is possible that a Remote Code Execution can be triggered when payload forces a stack-based overflow or a re-use of dangling pointer which refers to overwritten space in memory. | ||||
| CVE-2022-41184 | 1 Sap | 1 3d Visual Enterprise Author | 2026-02-25 | 7.8 High |
| Due to lack of proper memory management, when a victim opens a manipulated Windows Cursor File (.cur, ico.x3d) file received from untrusted sources in SAP 3D Visual Enterprise Author - version 9, it is possible that a Remote Code Execution can be triggered when payload forces a stack-based overflow or a re-use of dangling pointer which refers to overwritten space in memory. | ||||
| CVE-2022-41180 | 1 Sap | 1 3d Visual Enterprise Author | 2026-02-25 | 7.8 High |
| Due to lack of proper memory management, when a victim opens a manipulated Portable Document Format (.pdf, PDFPublishing.dll) file received from untrusted sources in SAP 3D Visual Enterprise Author - version 9, it is possible that a Remote Code Execution can be triggered when payload forces a stack-based overflow or a re-use of dangling pointer which refers to overwritten space in memory. | ||||
| CVE-2022-41179 | 1 Sap | 1 3d Visual Enterprise Author | 2026-02-25 | 7.8 High |
| Due to lack of proper memory management, when a victim opens a manipulated Jupiter Tesselation (.jt, JtTranslator.exe) file received from untrusted sources in SAP 3D Visual Enterprise Author - version 9, it is possible that a Remote Code Execution can be triggered when payload forces a stack-based overflow or a re-use of dangling pointer which refers to overwritten space in memory. | ||||
| CVE-2022-41177 | 1 Sap | 1 3d Visual Enterprise Author | 2026-02-25 | 7.8 High |
| Due to lack of proper memory management, when a victim opens a manipulated Iges Part and Assembly (.igs, .iges, CoreCadTranslator.exe) file received from untrusted sources in SAP 3D Visual Enterprise Author - version 9, it is possible that a Remote Code Execution can be triggered when payload forces a stack-based overflow or a re-use of dangling pointer which refers to overwritten space in memory. | ||||
| CVE-2022-41175 | 1 Sap | 1 3d Visual Enterprise Author | 2026-02-25 | 7.8 High |
| Due to lack of proper memory management, when a victim opens a manipulated Enhanced Metafile (.emf, emf.x3d) file received from untrusted sources in SAP 3D Visual Enterprise Author - version 9, it is possible that a Remote Code Execution can be triggered when payload forces a stack-based overflow or a re-use of dangling pointer which refers to overwritten space in memory. | ||||
| CVE-2022-41172 | 1 Sap | 1 3d Visual Enterprise Author | 2026-02-25 | 7.8 High |
| Due to lack of proper memory management, when a victim opens a manipulated AutoCAD (.dxf, TeighaTranslator.exe) file received from untrusted sources in SAP 3D Visual Enterprise Author - version 9, it is possible that a Remote Code Execution can be triggered when payload forces a stack-based overflow or a re-use of dangling pointer which refers to overwritten space in memory. | ||||
| CVE-2022-41170 | 1 Sap | 1 3d Visual Enterprise Author | 2026-02-25 | 7.8 High |
| Due to lack of proper memory management, when a victim opens a manipulated CATIA4 Part (.model, CatiaTranslator.exe) file received from untrusted sources in SAP 3D Visual Enterprise Author - version 9, it is possible that a Remote Code Execution can be triggered when payload forces a stack-based overflow or a re-use of dangling pointer which refers to overwritten space in memory. | ||||
| CVE-2022-41168 | 1 Sap | 1 3d Visual Enterprise Author | 2026-02-25 | 7.8 High |
| Due to lack of proper memory management, when a victim opens a manipulated CATIA5 Part (.catpart, CatiaTranslator.exe) file received from untrusted sources in SAP 3D Visual Enterprise Author - version 9, it is possible that a Remote Code Execution can be triggered when payload forces a stack-based overflow or a re-use of dangling pointer which refers to overwritten space in memory. | ||||
| CVE-2022-41167 | 1 Sap | 1 3d Visual Enterprise Author | 2026-02-25 | 7.8 High |
| Due to lack of proper memory management, when a victim opens a manipulated AutoCAD (.dwg, TeighaTranslator.exe) file received from untrusted sources in SAP 3D Visual Enterprise Author - version 9, it is possible that a Remote Code Execution can be triggered when payload forces a stack-based overflow or a re-use of dangling pointer which refers to overwritten space in memory. | ||||
| CVE-2022-3214 | 1 Deltaww | 1 Diaenergie | 2026-02-25 | 9.8 Critical |
| Delta Industrial Automation's DIAEnergy, an industrial energy management system, is vulnerable to CWE-798, Use of Hard-coded Credentials. Versions prior to 1.9.03.009 have this vulnerability. Executable files could be uploaded to certain directories using hard-coded bearer authorization, allowing remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2022-39808 | 1 Sap | 1 3d Visual Enterprise Author | 2026-02-25 | 7.8 High |
| Due to lack of proper memory management, when a victim opens a manipulated Wavefront Object (.obj, ObjTranslator.exe) file received from untrusted sources in SAP 3D Visual Enterprise Author - version 9, it is possible that a Remote Code Execution can be triggered when payload forces a stack-based overflow or a re-use of dangling pointer which refers to overwritten space in memory. | ||||
| CVE-2022-39806 | 1 Sap | 1 3d Visual Enterprise Author | 2026-02-25 | 7.8 High |
| Due to lack of proper memory management, when a victim opens a manipulated SolidWorks Drawing (.slddrw, CoreCadTranslator.exe) file received from untrusted sources in SAP 3D Visual Enterprise Author - version 9, it is possible that a Remote Code Execution can be triggered when payload forces a stack-based overflow or a re-use of dangling pointer which refers to overwritten space in memory. | ||||
| CVE-2022-39805 | 1 Sap | 1 3d Visual Enterprise Author | 2026-02-25 | 7.8 High |
| Due to lack of proper memory management, when a victim opens a manipulated Computer Graphics Metafile (.cgm, CgmTranslator.exe) file received from untrusted sources in SAP 3D Visual Enterprise Author - version 9, it is possible that a Remote Code Execution can be triggered when payload forces a stack-based overflow or a re-use of dangling pointer which refers to overwritten space in memory. | ||||
| CVE-2022-39804 | 1 Sap | 1 3d Visual Enterprise Author | 2026-02-25 | 7.8 High |
| Due to lack of proper memory management, when a victim opens a manipulated SolidWorks Part (.sldprt, CoreCadTranslator.exe) file received from untrusted sources in SAP 3D Visual Enterprise Author - version 9, it is possible that a Remote Code Execution can be triggered when payload forces a stack-based overflow or a re-use of dangling pointer which refers to overwritten space in memory. | ||||
| CVE-2022-39803 | 1 Sap | 1 3d Visual Enterprise Author | 2026-02-25 | 7.8 High |
| Due to lack of proper memory management, when a victim opens a manipulated ACIS Part and Assembly (.sat, CoreCadTranslator.exe) file received from untrusted sources in SAP 3D Visual Enterprise Author - version 9, it is possible that a Remote Code Execution can be triggered when payload forces a stack-based overflow or a re-use of dangling pointer which refers to overwritten space in memory. | ||||
| CVE-2021-36958 | 1 Microsoft | 18 Windows, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 15 more | 2026-02-24 | 7.8 High |
| <p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged file operations. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code with SYSTEM privileges. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights.</p> | ||||
| CVE-2021-34481 | 1 Microsoft | 19 Windows 10, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 16 more | 2026-02-24 | 8.8 High |
| <p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged file operations. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code with SYSTEM privileges. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights.</p> <p><strong>UPDATE</strong> August 10, 2021: Microsoft has completed the investigation and has released security updates to address this vulnerability. Please see the Security Updates table for the applicable update for your system. We recommend that you install these updates immediately. This security update changes the Point and Print default behavior; please see <a href="https://support.microsoft.com/help/5005652">KB5005652</a>.</p> | ||||
| CVE-2021-24105 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Package Manager Configurations | 2026-02-24 | 8.4 High |
| <p>Depending on configuration of various package managers it is possible for an attacker to insert a malicious package into a package manager's repository which can be retrieved and used during development, build, and release processes. This insertion could lead to remote code execution. We believe this vulnerability affects multiple package managers across multiple languages, including but not limited to: Python/pip, .NET/NuGet, Java/Maven, JavaScript/npm.</p> <p><strong>Attack scenarios</strong></p> <p>An attacker could take advantage of this ecosystem-wide issue to cause harm in a variety of ways. The original attack scenarios were discovered by Alex Birsan and are detailed in their whitepaper, <a href="https://medium.com/@alex.birsan/dependency-confusion-4a5d60fec610">Dependency Confusion: How I Hacked Into Apple, Microsoft and Dozens of Other Companies</a>.</p> <ul> <li><p>With basic knowledge of the target ecosystems, an attacker could create an empty shell for a package and insert malicious code in the install scripts, give it a high version, and publish it to the public repository. Vulnerable victim machines will download the higher version of the package between the public and private repositories and attempt to install it. Due to code incompatibility it will probably error out upon import or upon compilation, making it easier to detect; however the attacker would have gained code execution by that point.</p> </li> <li><p>An advanced attacker with some inside knowledge of the target could take a copy of a working package, insert the malicious code (in the package itself or in the install), and then publish it to a public repository. The package will likely install and import correctly, granting the attacker an initial foothold and persistence.</p> </li> </ul> <p>These two methods could affect target organizations at any of these various levels:</p> <ul> <li>Developer machines</li> <li>An entire team if the configuration to import the malicious package is uploaded to a code repository</li> <li>Continuous integration pipelines if they pull the malicious packages during the build, test, and/or deploy stages</li> <li>Customers, download servers, production services if the malicious code has not been detected</li> </ul> <p>This remote code execution vulnerability can only be addressed by reconfiguring installation tools and workflows, and not by correcting anything in the package repositories themselves. See the <strong>FAQ</strong> section of this CVE for configuration guidance.</p> | ||||